<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: What is&#160;SEO&#160;2.0?</title>
	<atom:link href="http://group8020.com/bs-report/whats-seo20-2890/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://group8020.com/bs-report/whats-seo20-2890/</link>
	<description>Think It. Do It.</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Sun, 07 Mar 2010 15:08:24 -0400</lastBuildDate>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=2.9.1</generator>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
		<item>
		<title>By: Search Engine Partner</title>
		<link>http://group8020.com/bs-report/whats-seo20-2890/comment-page-1/#comment-2083</link>
		<dc:creator>Search Engine Partner</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sun, 20 Sep 2009 03:23:49 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://group8020.com/?p=2890#comment-2083</guid>
		<description>Thank you for referencing SEO 2.0</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Thank you for referencing SEO 2.0</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Mark Hollander</title>
		<link>http://group8020.com/bs-report/whats-seo20-2890/comment-page-1/#comment-2052</link>
		<dc:creator>Mark Hollander</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 08 Jul 2009 02:34:58 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://group8020.com/?p=2890#comment-2052</guid>
		<description>&lt;p&gt;Thanks for the interesting post on SEO 2.0.  I think we can agree on 2 things:&lt;/p&gt;

&lt;ol&gt;&lt;li&gt;Blog posts that open with Wikipedia mentions are rather lame.&lt;/li&gt;
&lt;li&gt;There is no clear definition of the term which leads it wide open to interpretation as represented by the excerpts of other bloggers posts and a lack of definition on your own.&lt;/li&gt;
&lt;/ol&gt;

&lt;p&gt;We seem to differ on the belief on whether it is a hollow term.  I&#039;m not sure what &quot;the people&#039;s SEO&quot; or &quot;paradigm shift&quot; means, but you can be sure that it would get you laughed out of most budget meetings.  &quot;SEO 2.0&quot; is a BS Term rightfully placed in the BS Report.&lt;/p&gt;
</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Thanks for the interesting post on SEO 2.0.  I think we can agree on 2 things:</p>
<ol>
<li>Blog posts that open with Wikipedia mentions are rather lame.</li>
<li>There is no clear definition of the term which leads it wide open to interpretation as represented by the excerpts of other bloggers posts and a lack of definition on your own.</li>
</ol>
<p>We seem to differ on the belief on whether it is a hollow term.  I&#8217;m not sure what &#8220;the people&#8217;s SEO&#8221; or &#8220;paradigm shift&#8221; means, but you can be sure that it would get you laughed out of most budget meetings.  &#8220;SEO 2.0&#8243; is a BS Term rightfully placed in the BS Report.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: 6 New SEO 2.0 Definitions: It&#226; &#124; Did You Know?</title>
		<link>http://group8020.com/bs-report/whats-seo20-2890/comment-page-1/#comment-2038</link>
		<dc:creator>6 New SEO 2.0 Definitions: It&#226; &#124; Did You Know?</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 06 Jul 2009 16:07:02 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://group8020.com/?p=2890#comment-2038</guid>
		<description>[...] Pharma, Biotech &amp; Devices Can Ignore SEO 2.0 « The Buzzword Status Report « Group 8020 [...]</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] Pharma, Biotech &amp; Devices Can Ignore SEO 2.0 « The Buzzword Status Report « Group 8020 [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>
